Instructions You will begin this assignment by

Instructions You will begin this assignment by identifying a clinical issue that you see in your clinical practical. You will craft a PICO that will lead to specific evidence related to the clinical topic. Based on the PICO , you will design a structured search to uncover the ideal type of evidence for the . This means you need to think about where you would search for the ideal evidence and then construct the search that is appropriate for the database and source. See syllabus for details and preview the rubric. Criteria Meets expectations Needs moderate improvement Needs a great deal of improvement Missing Criterion Score Scenario/clinical issue 5 points Clinical issue/scenario is realistic and will lead to a of evidence 4 points Clinical issue/scenario is muddy or difficult to discern how it would lead a of evidence 2 points Clinical issue/scenario is too unrealistic or not relevant to a of evidence 0 points no clinical issue/scenario stated Score of Scenario/clinical issue, / 5 PICO elements 6 points All elements included in the PICO , may make sense that “C” is missing; well aligned with clinical issue/scenario 4 points Some of the elements are missing; alignment with clinical issue/scenario is somewhat illogical or difficult to discern 2 points Some of the elements are missing; little to no alignment with clinical scenario 0 points no PICO stated Score of PICO elements, / 6 PICO scope 4 points Scope of the PICO is appropriate for finding ideal types of evidence. 3 points Scope of the PICO is somewhat too large or small to lead to ideal evidence. 1 point Scope of the PICO is not appropriate for finding ideal evidence. 0 points PICO absent Score of PICO scope, / 4 Search plan key words 5 points Key words are logically derived from the PICO; controlled language well represented; appropriate use of truncation/wild cards 4 points Key words are somewhat logically derived from the PICO; controlled language needs to be more comprehensively represented; need to make better use of truncation/wild cards 2 points Key words are not well derived from the PICO; controlled language is not well represented; no use of appropriate use of truncation/wild cards 0 points Very limited key words; no controlled language or use of truncation/wild cards Score of Search plan key words, / 5 Boolean logic 6 points Boolean operators are logically constructed to lead to a sensitive yet specific search 5 points Boolean operators are somewhat logically constructed but may not lead to a sensitive and specific search 2 points Boolean operators are not logically constructed to lead to a sensitive and specific search 0 points absence of Boolean operators Score of Boolean logic, / 6 Search results 5 points Search results are fully represented line by line and the net results reflects an appropriate number of pieces of literature for the scope of the 4 points Search results are incompletely represented or the net results are not likely representative of the literature available for the scope of the 2 points Search results are not well represented and net results are not likely representative of the literature available for the scope of the 0 points Results are not documented Score of Search results, / 5 Database choice 3 points Database is appropriate to find ideal evidence and choice is well supported 2 points Database is somewhat related to finding ideal evidence or choice is not well supported 1 point Database is does not relate to finding ideal evidence and choice is not supported 0 points Database and narrative to support it are missing Score of Database choice, / 3 Ideal Evidence 6 points Evidence selected represents the closest to ideal from search findings 5 points Evidence selected is not likely to represent the ideal from the search findings 1 point Evidence is clearly not the ideal evidence from the search results 0 points No evidence selected Score of Ideal Evidence, / 6 Justification of ideal evidence 7 points Argument is sound to support the selection of the ideal evidence 6 points Argument has some relevant points to support the selection of the ideal evidence but it could be stronger 2 points Argument has lacks logical points to support the selection of the ideal evidence 0 points No justification of the evidence selection provided Score of Justification of ideal evidence, / 7 Reflection 3 points Your reflection is insightful and represents deep learning. 2 points Your reflection could be more insightful and in depth 1 point Your reflection lacks insight and depth 0 points Missing Score of Reflection, / 3 Total Score of PICO Search for Ideal Evidence, / 50 Overall Score Meets Expectations 45 points minimum You have done a great job with all or most of the elements of the assignment. Way to go! Needs some improvement 40 points minimum You done a good job with many of the criteria but there are some areas that need some work. Please see individual criteria. Needs a great deal of improvement 20 points minimum It looks like you need some help finding ideal evidence or best available. Seek out the librarian for help in the future Missing pieces 0 points minimum Please review the directions and template for this assignment as you have too many missing pieces to meet the learning objectives SCIENCE

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."